*****
The other day in class we came across the topic of internet
and the way people use it as a comfort for issues such as self harm and
suicide. It is easy to access thousands of groups and websites that are meant
to help people in times of extreme stress, depression, or confusion. If used
correctly, the internet can be extremely beneficial. Anti-suicide campaigns, a
kind person, or detailed stories may be just what a person needs to reconsider
taking their own life or harming their own body.
Although the internet has very valuable, positive resources,
it is not guaranteed they will be found. Sami and Alyssa said that they saw
someone tweet a depressing, worrisome message. One of the first comments on it
was, "go kill yourself already." We have thousands of wonderful
people on this planet that work hard to try and make a difference in people's
lives by proving they are worth something, but the first thing this poor girl
has to see is this comment? What is the point of having all of these resources
if someone is going to see the hate from others first?
We also talked about one of the trends on twitter about a
year ago: #cutforbieber. Young girls were posting images of themselves
self-harming in order to try to persuade Bieber to stop smoking marijuana. This
trend grew out of control and did not go unnoticed. The same issues still
happen everyday, however. People on Tumblr post images of themselves with deep
gashes on their arms and bleeding wrists. There are numerous amounts of people
that encourage the end to self harm on the website. There are also people that
promote this behavior and use the site to enable each other. I have seen some
of the strangest, absurd quotes, such as "blood never looked so pretty
until its coming out of your wrists."
I recently found out
that Tumblr has set new policies:
A New Policy Against Self-Harm Blogs
One of the great
things about Tumblr is that people use it for just about every conceivable kind
of expression. People being people, though, that means that Tumblr sometimes
gets used for things that are just wrong. We are deeply committed to supporting
and defending our users’ freedom of speech, but we do draw some limits. As a
company, we’ve decided that some specific kinds of content aren’t welcome on
Tumblr. For example, we prohibit spam and identity theft.
Our Content Policy has not, until now, prohibited blogs that
actively promote self-harm. These typically take the form of blogs that glorify
or promote anorexia, bulimia, and other eating disorders; self-mutilation; or
suicide. These are messages and points of view that we strongly oppose, and
don’t want to be hosting. The question for us has been whether it’s better to (a)prohibit
them, as a statement against the very ideas of self-harm that they are
advancing, or (b)permit them
to stay up, accompanied by a public service warning that directs readers to
helplines run by organizations like the National
Eating Disorders Association.
We are planning to
post a new, revised Content Policy in the very near future, and we’d like to
ask for input from the Tumblr community on this issue.
So what do you think? Is Tumblr taking a step in the right
direction? Or is this situation similar to our blog situation with the word
rape? Who determines what line is crossed with freedom of speech? What else
could Tumblr and other sites do to prevent people from promoting self-harm,
suicide, and eating disorders?
I think it is almost standing still because it is a step forward and one back. I know that tumblr has changed a little bit with certain tags now if you search a tag that is alarming it sends you to a page asking if you are okay and it shows links to inspirational happy blogs and hotlines if you need help. that's the good step but i think it is restricting their users and because of that some people will not like it and that is the step in the wrong direction for their site. its just like any other type of controversial topic you can never win both sides completely.
ReplyDeleteI feel tumblr is taking the right motions. Although we have the freedom of speech, some of these websites are available to younger kids and do we really want these graphic pictures in their thoughts that could provoke them if they are having a hard time? i am all for freedom of speech, but when it comes to such issues as anorexia and cutting, i feel that should be a private issue.
ReplyDeleteI think tumblr is taking a step in the right direction when it comes to blogs that promote these issues such as anorexia or self harm but what if there are blogs that are still posting images regarding these topics but only to let others know that theyre not alone or to explain the dangers? these topics will forever be controversial, therefore solutions will always depend on the mindset that others have
ReplyDeleteI think Tumblr is definitely going in the right direction. I really like this quote from Savannah "We have thousands of wonderful people on this planet that work hard to try and make a difference in people's lives". If more people thought of others in this view, the problem we're talking about and that so many people are addressing in their service projects wouldn't be as prominent in today's society.
ReplyDeleteI feel that when a major site such as tumbler gets involved on an issues such as this one where many of the people involved that are in danger and hurt themselves are under aged that something should be done either posting the available areas to offer help or blocking posts that are related to self harming for the sake of protecting young people.
ReplyDeleteEveryone tries to protect others from self-harm and harm done to others. However, there is no true line because if that were the case, everyone be wrapped in bubble wrap to protect them from ever encountering a physical act of violence. In the case of the internet being a player in the act, there is only so much websites can do. They need policies that can protect them in case anything goes to court. However, it is up to the company and its beliefs on where the line is drawn in the sand between how much self-harm and destruction they are going to allow. Only they can decide how far they want to take their policy to protect themselves from anything negative that could come at them in the future.
ReplyDelete